Table of Contents
I 'd include Toyota 2/3TC motor is someplace in the leading 3 yet with those domestics you definitely have my leading four of all time for reliability. Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine concern. Rust is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel.
I wonder exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's own means ... the 300i6 would do everything I need this truck to do patgizz composed: 3 things in the automotive globe refuse to break.
those need to be held as the standard to which everything else is measured. Almost every little thing else fades in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 of training course) Wow, because of the outpour of appreciation, it looked great so I got it, right here's the ad lmk what you people believe Oops, didn't imply to be cryptic, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm fairly huge, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly slim ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only issue I have actually ever before seen with trucks like that, are busted shifters. Ford made them a little also difficult and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage won't be the finest in the world, but it will damn sure run forever. Never had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply sounded like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 highway with the OD5. I ask yourself exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time obtaining out of it's own means ... The engine bay had not been made for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One canister get rid of an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, yet it draws. Mod motors need ahead out sidewards and you have to draw the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core assistance does not unbolt like in F250s and later F150s.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill created: In reply to HappyAndy: Thank you Captain Obvious What did he claim to require this? I'm really curious. I didn't see anything in his reply that would require this reaction. "They are usually trustworthy as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine loves sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones composed: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 freeway with the OD5. I ask yourself exactly how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point since when I needed to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that had not been sludged up really badly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're mosting likely to speak about a few concerns of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and state one is better than the various other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are some of the differences in between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same lorry.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Allow's chat concerning engine and actually just to define that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you recognize, I suggest, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you understand, around that time too. So we're not going to get back into, into the earlier things. Given that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are much a lot more popular and I wouldn't actually suggest a V6 engine.
There's a lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with strike to these engines, because they really did not have enough threading in the spark plug, which caused problems.
Really really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't explain ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I added that point because when I needed to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up really badly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to discuss a few concerns of these vans, however I I'm clearly not mosting likely to come out and claim one is much better than the various other. So if that's what you're searching for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are some of the distinctions between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're basically the exact same car.
Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. Let's chat concerning engine and in fact simply to define that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I suggest, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you know, around that time as well. So we're not going to obtain back into, right into the earlier things. Because 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more preferred and I would not really advise a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with impact to these engines, since they really did not have enough threading in the stimulate plug, which caused problems.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer near me Milwaukee
Ford F150 dealer