Table of Contents
Never ever had an engine concern. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel.
I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do whatever I require this truck to do patgizz created: 3 things in the auto globe refuse to break.
those need to be held as the criteria to which whatever else is measured. however, virtually whatever else pales in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 naturally) Wow, as a result of the outpour of appreciation, it looked excellent so I bought it, here's the advertisement lmk what you men think Oops, really did not mean to be cryptic, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm relatively large, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly narrow ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only trouble I have actually ever seen with vehicles like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little too difficult and they would break right at the floorboard.
Bear in mind the gas mileage won't be the very best worldwide, but it will certainly damn sure run for life. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had a lot of space in the taxi of them. wbjones created: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine issue.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel. I question just how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a hard time getting out of it's very own way ... The engine bay wasn't made for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One Canister get rid of an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, however it draws.
WonkoTheSane wrote: spitfirebill composed: In respond to HappyAndy: Thank you Captain Obvious What did he state to necessitate this? I'm really interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would certainly need this action. "They are usually reliable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine loves sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones wrote: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Corrosion is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 highway with the OD5. I wonder just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Extremely really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't explain ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point due to the fact that when I needed to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up really badly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to discuss a few problems of these vans, however I I'm clearly not mosting likely to come out and say one is much better than the other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the differences in between these 2 brand names? Bernie: Well, they're basically the same vehicle.
They appear to be a little bit more utilized because area, yet, you understand, those are a few of the uses, yet they're basically the exact same classification of automobile. Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines then. What problems do you see in between these 2 lorries? Bernie: Yeah. So allow's speak about engine and really simply to define that the design years, we're mosting likely to begin with 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has been around considering that, you recognize, around that time too. Since 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with strike to these engines, since they didn't have sufficient threading in the trigger plug, which triggered issues.
Very extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I really did not make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor due to the fact that when I had to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go via every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that wasn't sludged up actually badly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to discuss a couple of concerns of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to come out and claim one is better than the other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are some of the distinctions between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines then. Allow's speak about engine and actually just to define that the design years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I mean, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you recognize, around that time also. Since 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
So, you understand, Fords, and most of them come with the Triton V8. There's a great deal of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with impact to these engines, because they really did not have sufficient threading in the spark plug, which caused troubles. And frequently that would occur when you could be in a 15 traveler bus going up a hillside with a tons of people and all of a sudden boom, an ignition system bulges and you're stranded.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer near me Milwaukee
Ford F150 dealer